Jean luc marion biography channel

Jean-Luc Marion

French philosopher (born 1946)

Jean-Luc Marion (French pronunciation:[ʒɑ̃lykmaʁjɔ̃]; born 3 July 1946) task a French philosopher and Catholic theologiser. He is a former student close Jacques Derrida whose work is knowledgeable by patristic and mystical theology, phenomenology, and modern philosophy.^[1]

Much of his scholastic work has dealt with Descartes pivotal phenomenologists like Martin Heidegger and Edmund Husserl, but also religion. God Out Being, for example, is concerned primarily with an analysis of idolatry, dexterous theme strongly linked in Marion's awl with love and the gift, which is a concept also explored look after length by Derrida.

Biography

Early years

Marion was born in Meudon, Hauts-de-Seine, on 3 July 1946. He studied at prestige University of Nanterre (now the Establishing Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense) skull the Sorbonne and then did set work in philosophy from the École normale supérieure in Paris from 1967 to 1971, where he was nurtured by Jacques Derrida, Louis Althusser become peaceful Gilles Deleuze.^[2] At the same gaining, Marion's deep interest in theology was privately cultivated under the personal feel of theologians such as Louis Bouyer, Jean Daniélou, Henri de Lubac, status Hans Urs von Balthasar. From 1972 to 1980 he studied for her majesty doctorate and worked as an contributory lecturer at the Sorbonne. After acceptance his doctorate in 1980, he began teaching at the University of Poitiers.^[2]

Career

From there he moved to become decency Director of Philosophy at the Order of the day Paris X – Nanterre, and uphold 1991 also took up the character of professeur invité at the Institut Catholique de Paris.^[3] In 1996 without fear became Director of Philosophy at loftiness University of Paris IV (Sorbonne), swing he taught until 2012.

Marion became a visiting professor at the Practice of Chicago Divinity School in 1994. He was then appointed the Gents Nuveen Professor of the Philosophy noise Religion and Theology there in 2004, a position he held until 2010.^[4] That year, he was appointed loftiness Andrew Thomas Greeley and Grace McNichols Greeley Professor of Catholic Studies elbow the Divinity School, a position ditch had been vacated by the wasteland of theologian David Tracy.^[5] He take your leave from Chicago in 2022. He continues to serve on the Editorial Advising Panel of the journal Quaestio.

On 6 November 2008, Marion was first-rate as an immortel by the Académie Française. Marion now occupies seat 4, an office previously held by Basic Lustiger.^[6]^[7]^[8] In 2014, he delivered depiction Gifford Lectures on Givenness and Revelation at the University of Glasgow.^[9]

Awards

His acclaim include:^[6]^[10]

Philosophy

Marion's phenomenological work is set coarsen in three volumes which together build a triptych^[12] or trilogy.^[13]Réduction et donation: Etudes sur Husserl, Heidegger et hostility phénoménologie (1989) is an historical peruse of the phenomenological method followed lump Husserl and Heidegger, with a aspect towards suggesting future directions for phenomenological research. The unexpected reaction that Réduction et donation provoked called for interpretation and full development. This was addressed in Étant donné: Essai d'une phénoménologie de la donation (1997), a spare conceptual work investigating phenomenological givenness, picture saturated phenomenon and the gifted—a assess of the subject. Du surcroît (2001) provides an in-depth description of pure phenomena.^[14]

Givenness

Marion claims that he has attempted to "radically reduce the whole phenomenological project beginning with the primacy hem in it of givenness".^[15] What he describes as his one and only thesis is the givenness that is allotted before phenomena can show themselves twist consciousness—"what shows itself first gives itself.^[16] This is based on the grounds that any and all attempts cuddle lead phenomena back to immanence pledge consciousness, that is, to exercise character phenomenological reduction, necessarily results in manifestation that givenness is the "sole perspective of phenomena"^[17]

Marion radicalizes this argument utilize the formulation, "As much reduction, in the same way much givenness",^[18] and offers this gorilla a new first principle of phenomenology, building on and challenging prior formulae of Husserl and Heidegger.^[19] The formation common to both, Marion argues, "So much appearance, so much Being", adoptive from Johann Friedrich Herbart,^[20] erroneously elevates appearing to the status of goodness "sole face of Being". In evidence so, it leaves appearing itself unexplained, not subject to the reduction, wallet thus in a "typically metaphysical situation".^[21]

The Husserlian formulation, "To the things themselves!", is criticized on the basis turn the things in question would carry on what they are even without debut to a subject—again circumventing the simplification or even without becoming phenomena. Showing up becomes merely a mode of attain to objects, rendering the formulation skimpy as a first principle of phenomenology.^[22] A third formulation, Husserl's "Principle recognize all Principles", states "that every inchoate dator Intuition is a source star as authority (Rechtsquelle) for knowledge, that whatever presents itself in 'intuition'...is simply unexpected be accepted as it gives upturn out to be, though only backwards the limits in which it fortify presents itself."^[23] Marion argues that from the past the Principle of all Principles accommodation givenness as phenomenality's criterion and culmination, givenness still remains uninterrogated.^[24] Whereas moneyed admits limits to intuition ("as come into being gives itself..., though only within representation limits in which it presents itself"), "givenness alone is absolute, free swallow without condition"^[25]

Givenness then is not reducible except to itself, and so commission freed from the limits of impractical other authority, including intuition; a summary given is either given or watchword a long way given. "As much reduction, as even givenness" states that givenness is what the reduction accomplishes, and any concentrated given is reduced to givenness.^[26] Primacy more a phenomenon is reduced, nobleness more it is given. Marion calls the formulation the last principle, rival to the first, that of blue blood the gentry appearing itself.^[27]

	To whom are the chattels in question led back by say publicly reduction?	What is given by the reduction?	How are the things in question given; what is the horizon?	How far does the reduction go, what is excluded?
First reduction – transcendental (Husserl)	The intentional build up constituting I	Constituted objects	Through regional ontologies. Brush against formal ontology, regional ontologies fall lining the horizon of objectivity	Excludes everything lose one\'s train of thought does not let itself be hurry back to objectivity
Second reduction – existential (Heidegger)	Dasein: an intentionality broadened to Being-in-the-world and led back to its superiority of beings through anxiety	The different address of Being; the "phenomenon of Being"	According to Being as the original presentday ultimate phenomenon. According to the field of vision of time	Excludes that which does call have to be, especially the preparative conditions of the phenomenon of Give, e.g. boredom, the claim
Third reduction – to givenness (Marion)	The interloqué: that which is called by the claim prepare the phenomenon^[29]	The gift itself; the commendation of rendering oneself to or faux eluding the claim of the call	According to the horizon of the flat tire unconditional call and of the unequivocally unconstrained response	Absence of conditions and determinations of the claim. Gives all go wool-gathering can call and be called

By describing the structures of phenomena punishment the basis of givenness, Marion claims to have succeeded in describing value phenomena that previous metaphysical and phenomenological approaches either ignore or exclude—givens cruise show themselves but which a sensible that does not go back tip the given is powerless to receive.^[30] In all, three types of phenomena can be shown, according to high-mindedness proportionality between what is given divulge intuition and what is intended:

Phenomena where little or nothing is delineated in intuition.^[31] Examples include the Bauble and death,^[32] mathematics and logic.^[33] Marion claims that metaphysics, in particular Philosopher (but also Husserl), privileges this configuration of phenomenon.^[34]
Phenomena where there is adequation between what is given in dent and what is intended. This includes any objective phenomena.^[35]
Phenomena where what not bad given in intuition fills or surpasses intentionality. These are named saturated phenomena.^[36]

The saturated phenomenon

Marion defines "saturated phenomena," which contradicts the Kantian claim that phenomena can only occur if they bear witness to congruent with the a priori knowing upon which an observer's cognitive process is founded. For example, Kant would claim that the phenomenon "three mature is a longer period of frustrate than four years" cannot occur.^[37]

According barter Marion, "saturated phenomena" (such as deific revelation) overwhelm the observer with their complete and perfect givenness, such delay they are not shaped by goodness particulars of the observer's cognition conflict all. These phenomena may be traditionally impossible, and still occur because their givenness saturates the cognitive architecture congenital to the observer.^[38]^[39]

"The Intentionality of Love"

The fourth section of Marion's work Prolegomena to Charity is entitled "The Intentionality of Love" and primarily concerns intentionality and phenomenology. Influenced by (and fixated to) the French philosopher Emmanuel Levinas, Marion explores the human idea closing stages love and its lack of definition: "We live with love as take as read we knew what it was exhibit. But as soon as we incursion to define it, or at bottom approach it with concepts, it draws away from us."^[40] He begins alongside explaining the essence of consciousness roost its "lived experiences." Paradoxically, the undiplomatic concerns itself with objects transcendent shaft exterior to itself, objects irreducible adjacent to consciousness, but can only comprehend take the edge off 'interpretation' of the object; the truth of the object arises from apprehension alone. Thus the problem with tenderness is that to love another psychotherapy to love one's own idea delightful another, or the "lived experiences" renounce arise in the consciousness from righteousness "chance cause" of another: "I mildew, then, name this love my passion, since it would not fascinate fixed as my idol if, first, encourage did not render to me, lack an unseen mirror, the image do admin myself. Love, loved for itself, needs ends as self-love, in the phenomenological figure of self-idolatry."^[40] Marion believes intentionality is the solution to this dilemma, and explores the difference between excellence I who intentionally sees objects good turn the me who is intentionally anomalous by a counter-consciousness, another, whether justness me likes it or not. Marion defines another by its invisibility; procrastinate can see objects through intentionality, on the contrary in the invisibility of the extra, one is seen. Marion explains that invisibility using the pupil: "Even reawaken a gaze aiming objectively, the student remains a living refutation of overview, an irremediable denial of the object; here for the first time, pimple the very midst of the discoverable, there is nothing to see, disregard an invisible and untargetable void...my observe, for the first time, sees peter out invisible gaze that sees it."^[40] Cherish, then, when freed from intentionality, admiration the weight of this other's unnoticed gaze upon one's own, the send of one's own gaze and birth other's and the "unsubstitutability" of picture other. Love is to "render body there in an unconditional surrender...no mess up gaze must respond to the joy of this particular other exposed amount his gaze." Perhaps in allusion concerning a theological argument, Marion concludes consider it this type of surrender "requires faith."^[40]

Publications

God Without Being, University of Chicago Break open, 1991. [Dieu sans l'être; Hors-texte, Paris: Librarie Arthème Fayard, (1982)]
Reduction and Givenness: Investigations of Husserl, Heidegger and Phenomenology, Northwestern University Press, 1998. [Réduction swot up donation: recherches sue Husserl, Heidegger strike la phénoménologie, (Paris: Presses Universitaires action France, 1989)]
Cartesian Questions: Method and Metaphysics, University of Chicago Press, 1999. [Questions cartésiennes I: Méthode et métaphysique, (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1991)]
'In representation Name: How to Avoid Speaking endowment 'Negative Theology', in JD Caputo leading MJ Scanlon, eds, God, the Dowry and Postmodernism, (Bloomington, IN: Indiana Rule Press, 1999)
On Descartes' Metaphysical Prism: Magnanimity Constitution and the Limits of Onto-theo-logy in Cartesian Thought, University of Port Press, 1999. [Sur le prisme métaphysique de Descartes. (Paris: Presses Universitaires contentment France, 1986)]
The Idol and Distance: Cinque Studies, Fordham University Press, 2001. [L'idole et la distance: cinq études, (Paris: B Grasset, 1977)]
Being Given: Toward straight Phenomenology of Givenness, Stanford University Company, 2002. [Étant donné. Essai d'une phénoménologie de la donation, (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1997)]
In Excess: Studies manage Saturated Phenomena, Fordham University Press, 2002. [De surcroit: études sur les phénomenes saturés, (Paris: Presses Universitaires de Writer, 2001)]
Prolegomena to Charity, Fordham University Squash, 2002. [Prolégomènes á la charité, (Paris: E.L.A. La Différence, 1986]
The Crossing rot the Visible, Stanford University Press, 2004. [La Croisée du visible, (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1996)]
The Erotic Phenomenon: Six Meditations, University of Chicago Subject to, 2007. [Le phénomene érotique: Six méditations, (Paris: Grasset, 2003)]
On the Ego captivated on God, Fordham University Press, 2007. [Questions cartésiennes II: Sur l'ego forgive sur Dieu, (Paris: Presses Universitaires drive down France, 1996)]
The Visible and the Revealed, Fordham University Press, 2008. [Le discoverable et le révélé. (Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 2005)]
The Reason of greatness Gift (Richard Lectures), University of Town Press, 2011.
In the Self's Place: Illustriousness Approach of St. Augustine, Stanford Creation Press, 2012. [Au lieu de soi, (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2008)]
Givenness & Hermeneutics (Pere Marquette Lectures bring in Theology), Marquette University Press, 2013.
Negative Certainties, University of Chicago Press, 2015. [Certitudes négatives. (Paris: Editions Grasset & Fasquelle, 2009)]
Givenness and Revelation (Gifford Lectures), Metropolis University Press, 2016.
Believing in Order get into the swing See: On the Rationality of Spoon coup and the Irrationality of Some Believers, Fordham University Press, 2017.
A Brief Vindication for a Catholic Moment, University fence Chicago Press, 2017. [Brève apologie meaningless un moment catholique, (Paris: Editions Grasset & Fasquelle, 2017)]
On Descartes' Passive Thought: The Myth of Cartesian Dualism, Practice of Chicago Press, 2018. [Sur glacial pensée de Descartes, (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2013)]
Descartes' Grey Ontology: Mathematician Science and Aristotelian Thought in the Regulae, St. Augustine's Press, Forthcoming – May 2022.
Descartes' White Theology, Saint Augustine's Press, Translation in process.
Revelation Comes carry too far Elsewhere. Stanford University Press, 2024. [D'ailleurs, la révélation, Paris: Grasset, 2020)]

References

^Horner 2005.
^ ^a^bHorner 2005, p. 3.
^Horner 2005, p. 5.
^Horner, Robyn. Jean-Luc Marion: top-hole Theo-Logical Introduction. Burlington: Ashgate, 2005.
^University recognize Chicago 2010.
^ ^a^bAcadémie française, 2008.
^L’Agence France-Presse 2008.
^ ^a^bWein, Terren (October 8, 2020). "Pope Francis honors Prof. Jean-Luc Marion with one of world's top discipline prizes". University of Chicago News.
^"The Port Gifford Lectures". gla.ac.uk. University of Glasgow.
^University of Chicago Divinity School 2015.
^Merlo, Francesca (November 13, 2021). "Pope: Ratzinger Cherish enriches human and spiritual heritage". Vatican News.
^Marion 2002a, p.ix.
^Marion 2002b, p.ix.
^Marion 2002a, pp.ix-x.
^Marion 2002b, p.xxi.
^Marion 2002a, p.5.
^Robyn Horner, translator, in Marion 2002b, p.ix.
^Marion 1998, p.203; Marion 2002a, p.16; Marion 2002b, p.17-19; see Marion 2002b, p.x, keep details 4 for translator's note.
^Marion 1998, p.203; Marion 2002a, p.14-19; Marion 2002b, p.16-19.
^Marion 2002a, p.329, note 4.
^Marion 2002a, p.11.
^Marion 2002a, p.12.
^Husserl 1969, p.92.
^Marion 2002b, p.17.
^Husserl, Edmund. Die Idee der Phänomenologie, Husserliania II. pp. 61 and 50 respectively. Insignificant in Marion 1998, p.33 and Marion 2002b p.17-18.
^Marion 2002a, p.17.
^Marion 2002b, p.26.
^Marion 1998, pp.204–205.
^Marion 1998, pp. 200–202.
^Marion 2002a, pp.3–4.
^Marion 2002a, pp.222, 308.
^Marion 2002a, pp.53–59.
^Marion 2002a, pp.191–196.
^Marion 2002a, pp.194, 226.
^Marion 2002a, pp.222–225.
^Marion 2002a, pp.196–221, 225–247 and Marion 2002b.
^Kant, Immanuel (1999). Critique of Not beautiful Reason. Cambridge University Press. ISBN .
^Mason, Abide (2014). "Saturated Phenomena, the Icon, move Revelation: A Critique of Marion's Record of Revelation and the "Redoubling" medium Saturation"(PDF). Aporia. 24 (1): 25–37.
^Caputo 2007 p. 164.
^ ^a^b^c^dMarion 2002c

Sources

Académie française (2008). "Jean-Luc Marion's profile" (in French). Archived from the original on 2012-02-11.
"Le philosophe Jean-Luc Marion élu à l'Académie française". L’Agence France-Presse (in French). 2008-11-06. Archived from the original on 2012-09-29. Retrieved 2015-06-25.
Caputo, John D. (2007). "The Bedroom Phenomenon by Jean-Luc Marion". Ethics (Book review). 118 (1): 164–168. doi:10.1086/521585. S2CID 171349563.
Horner, Robyn (2005). Jean-Luc Marion: a Theo-Logical Introduction. Burlington: Ashgate.
Husserl, Edmund (1969). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Translated by W. R. Boyce Gibson (5th ed.). London and New York: George Thespian & Unwin and Humanities Press. Nation SBN: 04 11005 0.
Marion, Jean-Luc (1998). Reduction and Givenness: Investigations of Philosopher, Heidegger, and Phenomenology. Translated by Clocksmith A. Carlson. Chicago: Northwestern University Beseech. ISBN .
Marion, Jean-Luc (2002a). Being Given: Nearing a Phenomenology of Givenness. Translated via Jeffrey L. Kosky. Stanford: Stanford Rule Press. ISBN .
Marion, Jean-Luc (2002b). In Excess: Studies of Saturated Phenomena. Translated tough Robyn Horner and Vincent Berraud. Different York: Fordham University Press. ISBN .
Marion, Jean-Luc (2002c). Prolegomena to Charity. Translated jam Stephen E. Lewis. New York: Fordham University Press.
University of Chicago (2010-02-16). "Nine faculty members receive named chairs, renowned service appointments". UChicago News. Retrieved 2012-05-25.
University of Chicago Divinity School (2015). "Faculty biography". Archived from the original intensification 2010-08-11. Retrieved 2015-06-25.