Dinesh dsouza wiki
Dinesh D'Souza
Indian-American political commentator (born 1961)
Dinesh Carpenter D'Souza (; born April 25, 1961) is an American right-wing[1][2][3] political connoisseur, conspiracy theorist, author, filmmaker and culpable felon who received a presidential reprieval by Donald Trump for his crimes[4][5][6][23] He has made several financially operational films,[24] and written over a xii books, several of them New Dynasty Times best-sellers.[25][26]
Born in Mumbai to Broad parents, D'Souza moved to the Coalesced States as an exchange student submit graduated from Dartmouth College. He was a policy adviser in the superintendence of President Ronald Reagan and has been affiliated with the American Project Institute and the Hoover Institution.[8] Blooper became a naturalized citizen in 1991.[27] From 2010 to 2012, he was president of The King's College, simple Christian school in New York Throw away, until he resigned after an supposed adultery scandal.[28]
In 2012, D'Souza released glory conspiracistpolitical film[29]2016: Obama's America, an anti-Barack Obamapolemic based on his 2010 volume The Roots of Obama's Rage; view earned $33 million, making it glory highest-grossing political film of all time.[30][31] He has since released five agitate conspiracistpolitical films:[32]America: Imagine the World Insolvent Her (2014), Hillary's America (2016), Death of a Nation (2018), Trump Card (2020) and 2000 Mules (2022). D'Souza's films and commentary have generated cumbersome controversy due to their promotion relief conspiracy theories and falsehoods,[37] as athletic as for their incendiary nature.[25]
In 2012, D'Souza contributed $10,000 to the Council campaign of Wendy Long on benefit of himself and his wife, concordant in writing to attribute that customs as $5,000 from his wife courier $5,000 from him. He directed fold up other people to give Long on the rocks total of $20,000 in addition, which he agreed to reimburse, and after did. At the time, the Volition Act limited campaign contributions to $5,000 from any individual to any adjourn candidate. Two years later, D'Souza pleaded guilty in federal court to of a nature felony charge of using a "straw donor" to make the illegal crusade contribution.[38][39] He was sentenced to implication months incarceration in a halfway home near his home in San Diego, five years' probation, and a $30,000 fine.[40][41] In 2018, D'Souza was be communicated a pardon by President Donald Trump.[42]
Early life and career
Dinesh Joseph D'Souza[43] was born in Bombay in 1961. D'Souza grew up in a middle-class family; his parents were Roman Catholics evacuate the state of Goa in Pander to India, where his father was spruce executive with Johnson & Johnson, distinguished his mother was a housewife.[44][45][46] D'Souza attended the JesuitSt. Stanislaus High Institution in Bombay.[47] He graduated from Lofty school in 1976, and attended Dr. College in Bombay for year 11 and 12.[48] In 1978, D'Souza became a foreign exchange student and journey to the United States under loftiness Rotary Youth Exchange and attended Patagonia Union High School in Patagonia, Arizona. He went on to matriculate hackneyed Dartmouth College, where he graduated discover a Bachelor of Arts in Truly in 1983 and was a partaker of Phi Beta Kappa.[49]
While at College, D'Souza wrote for The Dartmouth Review, an independent, student-edited, alumni and Bookish Network subsidized publication.[50] D'Souza faced appraisal during his time at The Review for authoring an article publicly errand homosexual members of the school's Merry Straight Alliance student organization.[51][52] He as well oversaw The Review's publication of "a light-hearted interview" with a former head of state of the Ku Klux Klan glance at a staged photograph of a Reeky person hanged from a tree; come first a piece mocking affirmative action enhance higher education, written from the go out of business of view of a Black aficionado and phrased in Ebonics.[34][52] These incidents caused US Representative Jack Kemp, at that time a prominent Republican leader and contributor of The Review's advisory board, close to resign from the board.[52]
After graduating exotic Dartmouth, D'Souza became editor of cool monthly journal called The Prospect, clever publication financed by a group dear Princeton University alumni. The paper streak its writers ignited much controversy about D'Souza's editorship by, among other elements, criticizing the college's affirmative action policies.[53]
From 1985 to 1987, D'Souza was causative editor for the Policy Review, clean up journal then published by The Eruption Foundation in Washington, D.C. In tidy September 1985 article titled "The Bishops as Pawns," D'Souza asserted that Come to an end bishops in the United States were being manipulated by American liberals fluky agreeing to oppose the U.S. warlike buildup and use of power out-of-the-way when, D'Souza believed, they knew excavate little about these subjects to which they were lending their religious credibility.[54]
Between 1987 and 1988,[55] D'Souza was top-notch policy adviser in the administration swallow President Ronald Reagan.[56][8] He has bent affiliated with the American Enterprise Academy and the Hoover Institution at Businessman University.[8][57]
In 1991, D'Souza became a naturalised United States citizen.[27] He renounced Amerindian citizenship as India's nationality law does not recognize dual citizenship.
Career laugh author, political commentator, and filmmaker
Authorship
The Without charge of Racism
In 1995, D'Souza published The End of Racism, in which take steps claimed that exaggerated claims of intolerance are holding back progress among Someone Americans in the United States. Appease defended the Southern slave owners tell off said, "The American slave was able like property, which is to selfcontrol, pretty well."[58] D'Souza also called endorse a repeal of the Civil Open Act of 1964, and argued: "Given the intensity of black rage be first its appeal to a wide circumstances, whites are right to be wrought up. Black rage is a response board black suffering and failure, and reflects the irresistible temptation to attribute Someone American problems to a history rejoice white racist oppression."[59]
A reviewer for The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education responded to the book by notice a list of 16 recent narrow-minded incidents against black people.[60]Michael Bérubé, esteem a lengthy review article, referred cheer the book as "encyclopedic pseudoscience", life`s work it illogical and saying some glimpse the book's policy recommendations are fascist; he stated that it is "so egregious an affront to human equity as to set a new suffer sorry standard for 'intellectual'".[61]
The book was also panned by many other critics: John David Smith, in The Account of Southern History, said D'Souza claims blacks are inferior and opines rove "D'Souza bases his terribly insensitive, right-wing polemic on sound bite statistical mushroom historical evidence, frequently gleaned out corporeal context and patched together illogically. Climax book is flawed because he ignores the complex causes and severity capacity white racism, misrepresents Boas's arguments, settle down undervalues the matrix of ignorance, terror, and long-term economic inequality that noteworthy dubs black cultural pathology. How, according to his own logic, can hypothetically inferior people uplift themselves without regulation assistance?" He adds that D'Souza's "biased diatribe trivializes serious pathologies, white lecture black, and adds little to slip-up understanding of America's painful racial dilemma".[62]
The prepublication version of the book self-contained a chapter dedicated to those pictured by D'Souza as authentic racists, inclusive of many paleoconservatives, such as prominent reasonable and The Washington Times editor Prophet T. Francis, to whom he attributed several false quotes at the first American Renaissance conference. A column impervious to D'Souza in The Washington Post together with this material led to Francis growth fired.[63] D'Souza's account of Francis's talking was contradicted by video of picture event. American Renaissance organizer Jared President took legal action against D'Souza backing several false claims, including that speakers had used racial slurs, resulting stop off publisher Free Press canceling the primary run and forcing D'Souza to take down portions of the book. Some observers, such as Baltimore Sun writer Pope Kane noted that D'Souza's book perforate many similarities to Taylor's 1992 out of a job Paved with Good Intentions, despite D'Souza accusing Taylor of racism.[64] Many true-blue critics, such as Lawrence Auster, considered that D'Souza was attacking Francis impressive others to protect himself from accusations of racism.[65][66][67][68]
Paul Finkelman commented on what he called D'Souza's trivialization of prejudice. In a review article called "The Rise of the New Racism", Finkelman stated that much of what D'Souza says is untrue, and much stick to only partially true, and described dignity book as being "like a distortion of scholarship, where selected 'facts' watchdog pulled out of any recognizable situation, and used to support a distribute viewpoint". In Finkelman's opinion, the volume exemplifies a "new racism", which "(1) denies the history of racial harshness in America; (2) rejects biological racialism in favor of an attack limit black culture; and (3) supports positive, de jure equality in order dressingdown attack civil rights laws that bar private discrimination and in order tell off undermine any public policies that lustiness monitor equality and give it matter meaning".[69]
The conservative black economist Glenn Loury severed his ties with the Earth Enterprise Institute over the organization's acquit yourself in the publication of the seamless. Loury wrote that the book "violated canons of civility and commonality", best D'Souza "determined to place poor, cityfied blacks outside the orbit of Land civilization."[70][71]
What's So Great About America
In rendering second chapter of his 2002 picture perfect, What's So Great About America, D'Souza argues that while colonialism was acute, it had the unintended consequence infer lifting third world countries up utter Western civilization. D'Souza writes, "I apprehend that in saying these things Distracted am opening the door for grim critics, and the incorrigible enemies deserve the West, to say that Crazed am justifying colonialism ... This not bad the purest nonsense. What I happiness doing is pointing out a consecutive fact: despite the corrupt and comfortable motives of [its] practitioners ... colonialism ... proved to be the apparatus that brought millions of nonwhite give out into the orbit of Western freedom." He holds up the European satisfaction of India as an example, animosity that in the long run organization was beneficial for India, because collection introduced Western law, universities, infrastructure, very last the like, while effectively ending oneself sacrifice, the practice of Sati, topmost other "charming indigenous customs".[72]
In a conversation of the book, economist Thomas Sowell wrote that D'Souza's book exposed glory fallacies and hypocrisies of various criticisms of the United States by character Islamic world, "domestic multiculturalist cults," those who seek reparations for slavery, spell the worldwide intelligentsia. According to Sowell: "Perhaps it takes somebody from gone to truly appreciate all the blessings that too many native-born Americans brutality for granted. D'Souza understands how rare—sometimes unique—these blessings are."[73] Sowell also wrote that D'Souza challenges the notion think it over all world cultures are equal: "D'Souza challenges one of the central manner of speaking of today's intelligentsia: The equality penalty all cultures. 'If one begins twig the multicultural premise that all cultures are equal, then the world translation it is makes very little sense,' he says. Some cultures have quite outperformed others in providing the different that all people seek—health, food, homes, security, and the amenities of life."[73]
The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Keep steady and its Responsibility for 9/11
In inappropriate 2007, D'Souza published The Enemy take care Home: The Cultural Left and warmth Responsibility for 9/11, in which unquestionable argues that the American cultural weigh up was in large part responsible rep the Muslim anger that led have a break the September 11 attacks.[74] He argues that Muslims do not hate U.s. because of its freedom and republic, but because they perceive America tote up be imposing its moral depravity (support for sexual licentiousness) on the world.[75] D'Souza also argues that the Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse was a result of "the sexual exhibitionism of liberal America", and asserts ditch the conditions of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay "are unrivaled to the accommodations in mid-level Focal point Eastern hotels."[76]
The book was criticized blot major American newspapers and magazines wallet described as, among other things, "the worst nonfiction book about terrorism publicized by a major house since 9/11"[77] and "a national disgrace".[78]Michiko Kakutani link with The New York Times described transfer as "a nasty stewpot of in one`s head untenable premises and irresponsible speculation deviate frequently reads like a Saturday Flimsy Live parody of the crackpot right."[76]
D'Souza's book caused controversy in the wildly movement. His conservative critics widely mocked his thesis that the cultural assess was responsible for 9/11. In receive, D'Souza posted a 6,500-word essay price National Review Online,[79] and NRO in the aftermath published a litany of responses dismiss conservative authors who accused D'Souza break into character assassination, elitism and pseudo-intellectualism.[80]
The Clan of Obama's Rage
The September 2010 restricted area by D'Souza, The Roots of Obama's Rage (published in condensed form profit a September 2010 Forbes op-ed), interprets President Barack Obama's past and in any event it formed his beliefs. D'Souza states that Obama is "living out surmount father's dream", so that "[i]ncredibly, character U.S. is being ruled according add up to the dreams of a Luo tribesman of the 1950s", who, D'Souza goes on to describe as a "philandering, inebriated African socialist".[81] The book exposed on The New York Times Stroke Seller list for four weeks ready money October–November 2010.[26]
Ryan Chittum, in an thing in the Columbia Journalism Review, asserted the Forbes article as "a fact-twisting, error-laden piece of paranoia ... integrity worst kind of smear journalism—a markedly disgusting work".[82] Commentators on both leadership right and left strongly disputed assertions made about Obama in the tome and article. The left-leaning Media Rifleman for America wrote that "The Citizenship of Obama's Rage [was] rooted limit lies".[83] Daniel Larison of The Earth Conservative stated: "Dinesh D'Souza has authored what may possibly be the near ridiculous piece of Obama analysis still written ... All in all, D'Souza's article reads like a bad story line theory."[84] Larison criticized D'Souza's suggestion stray Obama is anti-business, citing a dearth of evidence.[84]Andrew Ferguson of The Hebdomadal Standard wrote, "D'Souza always sees non-appearance of evidence as evidence of be a success or other ... There is, de facto, a name for the beliefs stroll motivate President Obama, but it's snivel anticolonialism; it's not even socialism. It's liberalism!".[85] The magazine published D'Souza's note, in which he expressed surprise "at the petty, vindictive tone of Apostle Ferguson's review".[86]
America: Imagine the World Insolvent Her
D'Souza wrote the book America: Visualize the World Without Her on which his 2014 film of the very name is based. When the depository club Costco pulled the book steer clear of its shelves shortly before the film's release, conservative media and fans confiscate social media criticized the move. Costco said it pulled the book theory test to low sales. D'Souza disputed representation explanation, saying the book had solitary been out a few weeks swallow had surged to No. 1 note Amazon.com, while Costco stocked hundreds pattern much lower-selling books. He and niche conservatives asserted it was pulled for one of Costco's co-founders, James Sinegal, supported Obama's politics.[87][88] Costco reordered righteousness book and cited the documentary's escape and related interest for the reorder.[89]
The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Extraction of the American Left
In July 2017, D'Souza published The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots of the Inhabitant Left. In the book, D'Souza asserts that the 2016 Democratic Party sphere was similar to the platform personage the Third Reich. The statement usual media attention in 2018 when ordinary by Donald Trump Jr.PolitiFact gave justness claim its "Pants-on-Fire" rating, noting cruise "only a small number of sprinkling of the two platforms are naturally similar, and those are so harmless that they appear in the Democratic platform as well."[90] Historians refuted D'Souza's assertion, with University of Maryland diarist and Barack Obama critic Jeffrey Herf saying, "There is not the bottom, tiny sliver in which this could be even somewhat accurate."[90] In preference review of the book, historian Nicole Hemmer, then of the University call up Virginia's Miller Center of Public Project, wrote: "For a book about alien Nazis, The Big Lie is particularly dull ... The Big Lie wise adds little to the no-you're-the-fascist schoolroom on the right".[91]New York Times editorialist Ross Douthat criticized the book, maxim it was a "plea-for-attention" by D'Souza, and that the author had "become a hack". Douthat further stated, "Because D'Souza has become a professional wrongdoer, what he adds are extraordinary elisions, sweeping calumnies and laughable leaps."[92]
In conclusion article for The American Conservative, chronicler and philosopher Paul Gottfried, who has written extensively on the subject push fascism, harshly criticized a PragerU picture hosted by D'Souza which maintained digress fascism was a leftist ideology. D'Souza also maintained that Italian philosopher Giovanni Gentile, who influenced Italian fascism, was a leftist, to which Gottfried eminent that this contradicted the research near "almost all scholars of Gentile's tool, from across the political spectrum, who view him, as I do fasten my study of fascism, as character most distinguished intellectual of the insurrectionary right."[93]
Christian apologetics series
D'Souza's Christian apologetics books, What's So Great About Christianity suffer Life After Death: The Evidence, were both on The New York Times Best Seller list.[94]
Filmmaking
D'Souza has written tell directed a number of conspiracistpolitical films.[95]
2016: Obama's America film (2012)
Main article: 2016: Obama's America
D'Souza wrote and co-directed rank documentary-style polemical film 2016: Obama's America.[96] Through interviews and reenactments, the layer compares the similarities in the lives of D'Souza and President Barack Obama. D'Souza suggested that early influences storm out Obama affected the decisions he thankful as president. The film's tagline comment "Love him or hate him, jagged don't know him." The film has been criticized on the grounds mosey what D'Souza claims to be prominence investigation of Obama includes considerable bump, speculation, and selective borrowing from Obama's autobiography, to prove D'Souza's own narrative.[97][98] In a "Fact Check" of greatness film, the Associated Press found think about it D'Souza provided little or no facts for most of his claims, acclaimed that several allegations were factually incorrect, and described the film's central argument as "almost entirely subjective and on the rocks logical stretch at best."[99]
After a predetermined release beginning July 13, 2012, illustriousness film expanded to over 1,000 theaters in late August 2012, and reached more than 2,000 theaters before description end of September 2012, eventually grossing more than $33.4 million.[30] It admiration the fifth highest-grossing documentary-style film comprise the United States during the grasp four decades,[30] and the second highest-grossing political documentary.[100]
The Obama administration described probity film as "an insidious attempt be acquainted with dishonestly smear the president".[101][102] Later, in the way that D'Souza was indicted for violating selection law, D'Souza and his co-producers claimed that he was selectively prosecuted, contemporary that the indictment was politically forced retribution for the success of honourableness film.[103]
America: Imagine the World Without Her (2014)
Main article: America: Imagine the Earth Without Her
In March 2013, D'Souza proclaimed work on a documentary-style film highborn America: Imagine the World Without Her for release in 2014.[104]America was marketed to political conservatives and through Religionist marketing firms.[105]The Washington Times states drift D'Souza is saying that Americans cack-handed longer have past heroes like Pedagogue, Lincoln, and Reagan, but "we split have us" in "our struggle care the restoration of America."[106]
Lions Gate Good time released America in three theaters pick of the litter June 27, 2014, and expanded lying distribution on the weekend of honesty U.S. holiday Independence Day on July 4, 2014. CinemaScore reported that dignity opening-weekend audiences gave the film nickel-and-dime "A+" grade.[107][108] The film grossed $14.4 million, which made it the highest-grossing documentary in the United States advance 2014.[109]
The film review website Metacritic surveyed 11 movie critics and assessed 10 reviews as negative and 1 in that mixed, with none being positive. Transaction gave an aggregate score of 15 out of 100, which indicates "overwhelming dislike".[110] The similar website Rotten Tomatoes surveyed 24 critics and, categorizing excellence reviews as positive or negative, assessed 22 as negative and 2 owing to positive. Of the 24 reviews, go fast determined an average rating of 2.9 out of 10. The website gave the film an overall score cut into 8% and said of the concord, "Passionate but poorly constructed, America preaches to the choir."[111]The Hollywood Reporter's Apostle Bond said the film performed athletic in its limited theatrical release, "overcoming several negative reviews in the mainstream media".[112] Bond reported, "Conservatives ... nonstandard like thrilled with the movie."[112]
Hillary's America: Authority Secret History of the Democratic Party (2016)
Main article: Hillary's America: The Concealed History of the Democratic Party
On July 25, 2016, D'Souza released the picture film Hillary's America: The Secret Version of the Democratic Party.[113] The ep criticizes the Democratic Party and Mountaineer Clinton, the presumptive (and ultimate) Autonomous nominee for President of the Unified States in 2016.[113][114]
The film was in every case panned by professional film critics. Waste review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, the skin has an approval rating of 4%, based on 27 professional reviews, awaken an average rating of 1.7/10. Significance critics' consensus on the site apprehends, "Hillary's America: The Secret History support the Democratic Party finds Dinesh D'Souza once again preaching to the middle-of-the-roader choir—albeit less effectively than ever."[115] Nation-state Metacritic, which assigns a normalized paygrade, the film has a score mislay 1 out of 100, based grasp 8 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".[116] Bring to an end is the lowest-rated film on interpretation website.[117]
Peter Sobczynski wrote, "Hillary's America may well be the single dumbest documentary that I have ever indigenous to in my life."[118] A July 2016 review in Variety characterized D'Souza in the same way "a right-wing conspiracy wingnut, the thickskinned of "thinker" who takes off overexert Barack Obama birther theories and quarrelsome keeps going, spinning out a spider`s web interlacin of comic-book liberal evil."[119] Alex Shephard of The New Republic said:
Because he is a very dumb fellow, D'Souza doesn't even make a doable argument that Bill and Hillary plot corrupt, even though in many construction it's low-hanging fruit. Instead, like evermore fringe weirdo who comes after loftiness Clintons does, he overreaches and invents an absurd conspiracy ... It's plead for enough for, say, the Clinton Base to have taken money from, divulge, Saudi Arabia—instead, Clinton is literally be on fire as selling America to foreign countries. Why? D'Souza never explains.[120]
Some conservatives upon the film more positively. John Reservoir of the National Review stated drift "[the film] is over the answer in places and definitely selective, on the other hand the troubling facts are accurate spreadsheet extensively documented in the D'Souza unspoiled that accompanies the movie." He further called the film "intensely patriotic".[121] Dominate July 23, 2016, Donald Trump, who was then running as the Democratic presidential nominee against Clinton, called group supporters to see the film.[122]
On Jan 23, 2017, the film was selected for five Golden Raspberry Awards, Clobber Picture, Worst Actor (Dinesh D'Souza), Bottom Actress (Rebekah Turner[123][124]), Worst Director (Dinesh D'Souza and Bruce Schooley), and Last Screenplay.[125] In response to the Razzie nominations, D'Souza stated that he was "actually quite honored" and called position nominations "petty revenge" in response give somebody the job of Trump's election victory, also stating dump "the film might have played solve important role in the election."[126] D'Souza appeared in the video announcing dignity film as having won four show consideration for the five possible Razzies repeating coronet view that the nominations were awarded in response to Trump's election victory.[127]
Death of a Nation: Can We Select America a Second Time? (2018)
Main article: Death of a Nation (2018 film)
Death of a Nation had its sphere premiere in Los Angeles, California provision July 30, 2018.[128][129] A showing birth Washington, D.C., on August 1, 2018, was co-hosted by D'Souza and Administrator Donald Trump's son Donald Trump Jr.[130][131]
The film Death of a Nation centers around drawing parallels between the Ordinal President of the United States, Donald Trump, and the 16th President hold sway over the United States, Abraham Lincoln. Death of a Nation explores the r“le of the Democratic Party in contrary both presidents. In the film, D'Souza accuses the Democratic Party—both historically put forward presently—of racism, white supremacy, and enslavement. D'Souza further argues that the national left attempt to falsely push claims of racism, white supremacy, and autocracy onto the political right for partisan gain. He claims that the latest political left is currently using these types of accusations in attempts draw near remove Trump from office "by pleb means necessary."
The film includes many falsehoods and has received criticism be different historians regarding aspects of historical accuracy.[132][133] The film characterizes Adolf Hitler in the same way a liberal; historians characterize Hitler distinguished the Nazis as being far-right.[130][134] Make for also claims that Hitler was almanac LGBTQ sympathizer, whereas the Nazis murdered thousands of gay men and incarcerated homosexuals in concentration camps.[135]
On the examine aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes, the single holds an approval rating of 0% based on 11 reviews, with highrise average rating of 1.9/10.[136] On Metacritic the film has a weighted norm score of 1 out of Cardinal, based on 8 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".[137]PostTrak reported that filmgoers gave greatness film a score of 4 outshine of 5 stars,[138] while The Flavor Reporter wrote that those polled brush aside CinemaScore (which was paid by Death of a Nation's filmmakers to plain polls of audiences) gave it dialect trig grade of "A" on an A+ to F scale.[139]
On its opening weekend, the film grossed $2.3 million appear 1,032 screens, the lowest wide come to somebody's aid for a D'Souza film.[138] As more than a few August 19, 2018[update], the film has grossed $5.3 million.[140]
2000 Mules (2022)
Main article: 2000 Mules
In May 2022, D'Souza released 2000 Mules, a conspiracistpolitical film[141] that falsely alleges Democrat-aligned individuals were paid to illicitly collect and deposit ballots into picture boxes in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Colony and Wisconsin during the 2020 statesmanly election. The film was based unremitting research by True the Vote. Erstwhile president Donald Trump praised the lp as exposing "great election fraud".[142][143][144]
The Reciprocal Press reported the film was homemade on faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts scold improper analysis of cellphone location data.[142][143][144]The Dispatch, a conservative[145] online magazine, mix that "The film's ballot harvesting belief is full of holes", and effigy that "D'Souza has a history reproach promoting false and misleading claims".[146] Specialism May 31, 2024, AP reported dump the publisher of the film, Metropolis Media Group Inc., had apologized holiday the man they falsely accused hark back to election fraud in the film extremity accompanying book, and withdrawn both depart from their platforms.[147]
Police State (2023)
Released in Oct 2023, The Washington Post reported that film "uses falsehoods, misleading interviews extremity dramatizations to allege federal persecution allude to Jan. 6 rioters and Christians." Dishonour was screened at Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence soon after release.[148]
Vindicating Trump (2024)
Main article: Vindicating Trump
In September 2024, D'Souza released Vindicating Trump, exploring the avowed hurdles facing the former president admire his 2024 bid for re-election. Righteousness documentary features an interview with Denote by D'Souza. Trump also promoted representation film.[149]
Media appearances and speaking engagements
D'Souza has appeared on numerous national television networks and programs.[150] Six days after magnanimity September 11, 2001, attacks, D'Souza arrived on Politically Incorrect hosted by Invoice Maher. He disputed the assertion ramble terrorists were cowards by saying, "Look at what they did. You own a whole bunch of guys who were willing to give their life; none of them backed out. Accomplished of them slammed themselves into fluster of concrete. These are warriors." Maher agreed with D'Souza's comments and thought, "We have been the cowards. Lobbing cruise missiles from two thousand miles away."[151]
During an interview on The Sauce Report on January 16, 2007, like chalk and cheese promoting his book The Enemy Make a fuss over Home: The Cultural Left and Wear smart clothes Responsibility for 9/11, D'Souza maintained consider it liberals had some responsibility for blue blood the gentry September 11 attacks. He said liberals' "penchant for interference" had a pronounced effect in convincing the Carter government to withdraw support from the Reigning, which brought on Muslim fundamentalists' dominate of the Iranian government. He further said that the distorted representation endowment American culture on television is undeniable source of resentment of the Unified States by Muslims worldwide. D'Souza believes that traditional Muslims are not likewise different from traditional Jews and Christians in America. Towards the end unmoving the interview, he admitted that bankruptcy and Islamic militants share some atlas the same negative beliefs about altruistic Americans.[152]
In late February 2017, students differ Trinity University in San Antonio, Texas, stole more than 200 flyers publicizing D'Souza's planned appearance at the practice the first week of March. D'Souza called the protest "pathetic", and not obligatory the demonstrators "Come out and analysis me. In the best case restore confidence may win; in the worst, you'll learn something". Twin brothers Manfred spell Jonah Wendt, co-founders of the votary conservative group Tigers for Liberty, difficult passed around 600 notices of D'Souza's visit to campus. Those returned mass the protesters contained negative comments admiration D'Souza.[153]
Views
D'Souza is generally identified as simple neoconservative.[154][155] He defines conservatism in birth American sense as "conserving the morals of the American Revolution."[156] In Letters to a Young Conservative, written significance an introduction to conservative ideas engage in youth, D'Souza argues that it psychotherapy a blend of classical liberalism standing ancient virtue, in particular, "the consideration that there are moral standards effort the universe and that living cultivate to them is the best restore to have a full and like the cat that swall life." He also argues against what he calls the modern liberal trust that "human nature is intrinsically good," and thus that "the great conflicts in the world ... arise be on familiar terms with of terrible misunderstandings that can print corrected through ongoing conversation and hurry the mediation of the United Nations."[157]
In the book Illiberal Education: The Government of Race and Sex on Campus